
Заводские приемочные испытания (ТОЛСТЫЙ) and Site Acceptance Testing (СБ) are two complementary validation stages for pharmaceutical equipment. FAT is done at the equipment manufacturer’s facility (перед отправкой) to verify all specifications and functions meet the customer’s requirements. SAT is performed after installation at the customer’s site to confirm the machine works correctly in the actual production environment. Вместе, FAT and SAT help catch issues early (экономия времени и средств) и обеспечить Соответствие GMP. This article explains FAT vs SAT in detail – covering what each test verifies, ключевые различия, how they fit into the IQ/OQ/PQ lifecycle, sample checklists for packing lines (волдырь, капсула, планшет, картонирование), and buyer best-practice questions.

А Заводские приемочные испытания (ТОЛСТЫЙ) is a formal, documented evaluation of equipment at the manufacturer’s site, conducted before the unit is shipped to the customer. It verifies that the machine has been built to the agreed Спецификация требований пользователя (УРС) and is functioning correctly. During FAT, the vendor and customer (or their representatives) execute an approved FAT protocol of test cases and checklists. Typical objectives include demonstrating compliance with specifications, catching defects early, and giving the buyer confidence that “the equipment is ready to ship”.
In FAT, the focus is on standalone performance and adherence to design. It generally includes:
A successful FAT ends with a signed FAT report, itemizing passed tests and listing any issues to fix before shipment. По сути, FAT ensures “the system is ready to be shipped” by verifying its core functions under controlled factory conditions.
The FAT typically takes place after the machine is fully assembled but before it leaves the manufacturer’s floor. It follows design qualification (если таковые имеются) and precedes delivery. Key participants usually include vendor engineers and technicians, and representatives from the buying company (Инженеры по обеспечению качества/валидации, production staff). The buyer’s team should arrive prepared, often bringing the URS, test protocols, and any specialized materials to run. The FAT is the buyer’s last chance to catch major discrepancies under the supplier’s control.

Фигура: A pharmaceutical блистерная упаковочная машина undergoing acceptance testing. In a rigorous FAT, every subsystem (формирование, уплотнение, кормление, элементы управления) is checked against the URS. A subsequent SAT then repeats key functional tests after installation in the end-use environment.
А Приемочное тестирование сайта (СБ) is a documented test performed at the customer’s facility after the equipment is delivered and installed but before it is released for production. SAT re-verifies that the machine meets requirements in its actual operating context. In SAT, the equipment is checked for proper installation, utilities hookup, system integration, and final performance.
SAT typically includes:
A successful SAT ends with an SAT report or certificate signed by both vendor and customer. It provides documented evidence that “the equipment/system has been delivered in good condition and has not been affected by transportation” and now operates correctly on site. На практике, a thorough SAT gives confidence that the machine is ready for the next phase of validation (ИК/Белый/PQ) or routine production.
Суммируя, FAT and SAT are sequential checkpoints: FAT catches defects early in the factory; SAT catches any remaining issues once the machine is on-site. Both are crucial for GMP compliance and risk management.
FAT vs SAT at a Glance
| Особенность | ТОЛСТЫЙ (Заводские приемочные испытания) | СБ (Приемочное тестирование сайта) |
| Where & Когда | At vendor’s facility, перед отправкой. | At customer’s site, after installation. |
| Цель | Verify the machine meets design/URS specs and works stand-alone. | Verify the machine functions correctly in the actual production line (коммунальные услуги, среда, интеграция). |
| Среда | Controlled factory conditions (vendor utilities). | Real plant conditions (actual air, власть, температура). |
| Testing Scope | Detailed functional tests against contract specs; simulate process using representative materials if possible. | Check installation (IQ), then repeat core functionality and performance with final product/setup; test integration with upstream/downstream equipment. |
| Acceptance Criteria | Based on the user requirements and agreed test plan (например. скорость, точность). | Confirms site-adjusted performance (например. consistent production quality, utility parameters) meet criteria. |
| Документация | Formal FAT protocol, протоколы испытаний, punch-list, final FAT report. | Formal SAT protocol (often simpler), deviation log/punch-list, sign-off, and traceability to URS. |
| Исход | “Equipment approved for shipment” (or list of fixes). | “Machine accepted on site” (or list of remaining issues to fix). |
This table highlights the key distinctions: FAT is all about proving the machine is built to spec до it leaves the factory, while SAT proves it still meets requirements после installation in its working environment. Both are typically required under GMP/Annex 15 guidance.
FAT and SAT are part of the larger qualification lifecycle for GMP equipment. In a typical project flow, you start with the User Requirements Specification (УРС) and Design Qualification (ДК), then proceed to FAT, доставка, установка, СБ, and finally IQ/OQ/PQ on site. The mermaid diagram below illustrates this sequence:

Фигура: Qualification lifecycle flow. After defining УРС, a Factory Acceptance Test (ТОЛСТЫЙ) is performed at the vendor site. Then the equipment is shipped and installed, followed by a Site Acceptance Test (СБ). Окончательно, Квалификация установки (IQ), Операционная квалификация (ОК), и квалификация производительности (ПК) are executed on site (note: DQ may precede FAT but is omitted here for simplicity).
This flow is supported by GMP guidance. Например, under EU GMP Annex 15 and ISPE C&Q practices, documented FAT results can often be leveraged into IQ/OQ, reducing duplication. Фактически, ISO/ISPE guidelines note that FAT “activities contribute directly to Design Qualification (ДК) and Installation Qualification (IQ) evidence,” helping compress overall qualification time. На практике, a rigorous FAT with proper documentation means your IQ team can reuse those findings (например. installation checks already done) rather than re-testing the same points.
A comprehensive FAT protocol for pharmaceutical packaging machinery typically includes the following elements:
Following this checklist helps catch deviations in the factory. Например, industry experts warn against vague FAT records – only quantitative, equipment-specific test data should be accepted. Accepting mere supplier “pass” statements or incomplete checklists can mask problems. Always record measured values and trace them to the specific machine serial number.
A SAT protocol for pharmaceutical packing machines usually covers:
Суммируя, the SAT protocol re-confirms all critical functionality under real conditions. It’s the last checkpoint before commissioning. Например, Jinlupacking notes that a thorough SAT often generates baseline data that can go straight into the IQ/OQ protocols, avoiding retesting of utilities and environment.
Pharma packaging lines (волдырь, капсула, планшет, Картонические машины) have their own FAT/SAT emphasis. Here are some typical points:
Во всех случаях, both FAT and SAT check that the machine runs at the specified speed and yields the right count/weight/quality with the actual product. Skipping tests (например, not running real product at FAT) can lead to failures at SAT. As one expert warns, “running a FAT with the OEM’s generic materials is not the same as running it with yours” – if you don’t test real materials in FAT, site issues often emerge later.
Even if a machine passes every item on the FAT checklist, it can still fail SAT if conditions change. Common reasons include:
Суммируя, FAT tests the machine in isolation; SAT tests it in context. Every difference in site conditions or setup is a potential failure mode. A well-executed SAT, однако, is the final check to uncover such issues before full production.
When selecting a machine supplier, industry buyers often use FAT/SAT readiness as a key qualifier. Например, Jinlu’s supplier audit guide recommends asking:
These questions help gauge the supplier’s validation maturity. An experienced vendor should readily answer that they deliver machines “audit-ready” with complete FAT/SAT/IQ/OQ packages.
To ensure a smooth acceptance process, buyers can use this quick FAT/SAT checklist:
Following such a checklist avoids surprises. Например, Seeing a supplier’s packing photos or generic QC notes after the fact is нет proof of compliance. The strongest evidence is a complete set of FAT/SAT records tied to the specific machine.
FAT and SAT are both essential checks to ensure your pharmaceutical packaging machines perform reliably and comply with GMP. By thoroughly testing equipment at the vendor’s site (ТОЛСТЫЙ) and again after installation (СБ), you minimize costly surprises and validate that all URS points are met.
Ready to streamline your acceptance tests? Jinlu Packing delivers pharma-grade equipment (блистерные упаковщики, капсульные наполнители, Пережи для планшетов, counting and cartoning lines, и т. д.) with full FAT/SAT support. Every machine is shipped with a complete FAT/SAT protocol and IQ/OQ/PQ kit to make your qualification faster and smoother. Contact Jinlu today to discuss your URS and set up FAT/SAT plans for your new equipment, or visit our product pages for Машины для наполнения капсул, Блистерные упаковочные машины, Таблеточные прессы, Счетные машины, Картонирующие машины и еще. Our team will help you plan FAT/SAT steps and provide turn-key validation documentation so your project stays on time and compliant.
Get in touch with Jinlu’s experts for FAT/SAT guidance and ensure your new packaging line is validation-ready from day one.
ТОЛСТЫЙ (Заводские приемочные испытания) is performed at the equipment manufacturer’s facility before shipment to verify that the machine meets the agreed specifications and functional requirements. СБ (Приемочное тестирование сайта) is performed at the customer’s facility after installation to confirm that the equipment works correctly with the actual site utilities, среда, and connected systems.
FAT allows the buyer and supplier to identify design, Производство, контроль, or performance issues before the machine leaves the manufacturer’s facility. Problems found at this stage are generally easier to investigate and correct because the equipment, engineering team, инструменты, and test environment are readily available. A well-planned FAT can therefore reduce commissioning delays and avoid unnecessary rework at the customer’s site.
FAT is commonly performed before SAT, but whether it is mandatory depends on the project, contract, оборудование, и требования к качеству. FAT verifies the equipment before shipment, while SAT verifies the equipment after installation at the customer’s site. Для фармацевтического оборудования, the two tests can complement each other rather than replace one another.
Да. Passing FAT does not guarantee that equipment will pass SAT. FAT is usually performed under controlled factory conditions, while SAT evaluates the machine after transportation, установка, connection to actual utilities, and integration with other equipment. Differences in power supply, сжатый воздух, условия окружающей среды, подача продукта, or line integration can create issues that were not visible during FAT.
A pharmaceutical equipment FAT checklist should be based on the agreed specifications and may include equipment identification, mechanical inspection, electrical systems, PLC/HMI functions, сигналы тревоги, предохранительные блокировки, machine operation, performance testing, документация, and agreed acceptance criteria. Для упаковочного оборудования, the checklist may also cover production speed, feeding accuracy, уплотнение, кодирование, отказ, and other machine-specific functions.
A SAT checklist should focus on the equipment after installation at the customer’s site. Depending on the machine, it may include installation status, electrical connections, compressed air and other utilities, machine operation, safety devices, сигналы тревоги, communication with upstream and downstream equipment, production performance, and operator functions. The SAT should use acceptance criteria agreed before testing rather than relying only on an informal machine demonstration.
FAT usually involves the supplier’s engineers and the buyer’s representatives (Контроль качества/проверка, инженерия, операции). SAT should include the installing vendor or service team, Контроль качества/проверка, and the customer’s operations staff. Third-party consultants or inspectors are sometimes included.
Each requires a pre-approved protocol that outlines all tests, acceptance criteria, and responsibilities. Во время тестирования, fill in the protocol with real-time data and observations. Deliverables include the executed protocol, a punch-list of any deviations, and a signed final report or certificate. For SAT, also prepare a traceability matrix linking tests back to URS requirements.
FAT and SAT are acceptance tests, while IQ and OQ are typically parts of an equipment qualification strategy. FAT checks the equipment at the manufacturer’s facility before shipment; SAT checks it after installation at the customer’s site. IQ (Квалификация установки) focuses on whether the equipment has been installed according to approved requirements, while OQ (Операционная квалификация) verifies that it operates as intended across specified operating ranges. The exact sequence and documentation depend on the company’s validation strategy and project requirements.
FAT can support a pharmaceutical equipment qualification and validation strategy, but FAT itself should not automatically be treated as equivalent to GMP qualification. Its role depends on the equipment, project requirements, оценка риска, and applicable quality system. In some projects, appropriate FAT testing can provide documented evidence that is leveraged during later qualification activities, potentially reducing unnecessary duplication when justified.
Ссылки:
1.Automation systems in the process industry – Factory acceptance test (ТОЛСТЫЙ), site acceptance test (СБ), and site integration test (SIT) —— ANSI/ISA-62381-2026 / МЭК 62381:2024
2.Engineering SOP -FAT : Заводские приемочные испытания & СБ : Site Acceptance Test —— pharmastate.academy
3.FAT and SAT Testing in Pharma Equipment —— Scribd
4.Qualification studies at SAT acceptance stage of the pharmaceutical containers washing machine —— ИсследованияГейт
5.Factory and Site Acceptance Test Checklist —— Scribd
Мелкий фу, Основатель компании Jinlupacking, приносит 20 многолетний опыт работы в секторе фармацевтического оборудования. Под его руководством, Jinlu превратилась в надежного поставщика, интегрирующего дизайн., производство, и продажи. Петти с радостью делится своими глубокими отраслевыми знаниями, чтобы помочь клиентам разобраться в сложностях фармацевтической упаковки., гарантируя, что они получат не только оборудование, но настоящее комплексное сервисное партнерство, адаптированное к их производственным целям..